Unequal Odds: Addressing and Mitigating Bias in Life Insurance
Model bias in the life insurance industry can lead to unfair outcomes, such as discriminatory premium rates and eligibility decisions. These biases often arise from flawed machine learning processes, erroneous assumptions, or biased data. Actuaries and data scientists must take steps to mitigate this.
For example, underwriting models might unfairly disadvantage one gender due to outdated actuarial tables, or health insurance models might underpredict healthcare costs for minority populations. To address these issues, actuaries and data scientists can use advanced methodologies like sensitivity analysis and fairness metrics to improve outcomes.
Advanced Methodologies for Assessing and Mitigating Bias
Advanced methodologies for assessing and mitigating bias include fairness metrics such as demographic parity, equal opportunity, and predictive parity.
- Demographic parity ensures that the decision rate is the same across different groups.
- Equal opportunity requires that the true positive rate is consistent across groups, which can be evaluated using logistic regression.
- Predictive parity ensures that predictive values are equal across groups, and this can be assessed using confusion matrices.
Sensitivity analysis, involving techniques like Monte Carlo simulations and bootstrapping, helps understand how changes in model inputs affect outputs, revealing variables that disproportionately influence predictions for certain groups. By integrating these methodologies, life insurers can develop more accurate and fair models, ensuring equitable treatment for all policyholders and maintaining public trust.
KPMG Experts:
